In
the spring of 1995, I encountered a Nigerian writer through the newsletter of
the Paul Robeson Cultural Center at Penn State University where I was teaching
at the time. Her name is Buchi (“Butchie”) Emecheta.
She
made a statement that I copied out of that newsletter, and have used many times
since. She said this:
In Nigeria, you are simply
not allowed to commit suicide in peace because everyone is responsible for the
other person… An individual’s life belongs to the community and not just to him
or her.
In
contrast, individualism permeates U.S. American culture. We are all about
individual rights and individual responsibilities, personal style and personal
freedom, property and territory.
We
are suspicious of people who have too strong a sense of community. We really
don’t think it takes a village to raise a child. We are quite certain that any
nuclear family worth its salt really ought to be able to do it on its own.
We
love stories of people who pull themselves up by the bootstraps, and succeed
against the odds. We love the idea so much we have turned the noun,
“bootstrap,” into the verb, “bootstrapping.” Google it and you will find a
veritable invasion of bootstrapping verbs into various fields, ranging from
computer programming to physics to corporate finance.
But
we are called by God to community. Very soon, Fr. Michael will consecrate bread
and wine, and we will share, once again, our communal feast of Christ’s body
and blood.
On this
holy Maundy Thursday night, we celebrate that event depicted so beautifully in
the carving over Grace’s altar: Jesus calls Eucharistic community into being by
blessing and sharing bread and wine with his disciples in his last meal with
them on this Earth.
But
what do we think it means?
Preparing
for this homily, I googled the phrase “Eucharistic community.” How many websites
would you guess contain the phrase, “Eucharistic community”?
Google
is very good at counting things, including how long a search took. So I can
report to you tonight that it took exactly .41 seconds for Google to locate
37,700 results for the phrase “Eucharistic community.”
But
I ask again, what do we think it means?
I glanced
through the first few pages of results, and some of them were mission
statements of Christian churches. They said things like this example from a
church in Wisconsin:
“We are a diverse and inclusive Spirit-based Eucharist community
committed to the message of unconditional love given us by Jesus and to our
call to imitate and reflect that love in our lives..,” and so on.
Sounds
good, right? But if so many of us believe this, and come together so often to
participate in this radical act of community… And that is what I think the
Eucharist is: a radical act of community.
And
if so, and if there are so many believers, how is it that our world continues
to suffer so terribly from lack of community? Right here in northeast Louisiana
we are divided by race and ethnicity; by profession and status; by railroad
tracks, highways and a river; by politics, by age group, by fear and distrust;
indeed, by righteousness itself.
I
invite us to consider this evening that perhaps it is because we focus on half
of the story. In preparing this sermon, I also googled “foot-washing
community.” And what do you suppose I found?
It
took Google exactly .26 seconds to find….. (drumroll please) 53 results.
Jesus
initiated two things on this holy evening: Holy Eucharist and love-drenched
service to humankind. And please note, he does not make one more important than
the other.
To
the contrary, according to St. John… during supper… Jesus…got up from the table…and began to wash the disciples’ feet.
Fr.
Michael, help me. We serve Holy Eucharist here at Grace how many times a week?
Twice most Sundays and twice on Wednesdays—at least when school is in session…
that’s four times most weeks.
But
we wash each other’s feet once a year.
How
did Holy Eucharist become a sacrament and not foot washing? I would be hard
pressed to pin that difference to anything in the Gospel message.
Of
course, actually washing each other’s feet on Maundy Thursday is symbolic of
all of our service to each other and the world. Jesus himself said, I do this
as an example of what you are to do.
But
given our perhaps disproportionate emphasis on enacting Holy Eucharist vs.
enacting foot washing, do we fully understand and embrace the depth of the
interconnection between feasting at the Holy Table and love-drenched service to
each other and the world?
Holy
Eucharist Rite II Prayer C begins to get at the point. It’s at the top of page
372 in the prayer book, if you want to see for yourself. (BTW, a good reason
for everyone to come to a Grace School chapel on a Wednesday at 8 a.m. every so
often is that we use Prayer C.)
Reading
in the middle of the first paragraph on p. 372: Deliver us from the presumption of coming to this Table for solace only,
and not for strength; for pardon only, and not for renewal.
We
feast at the Table for strength and renewal to do the work as Christ’s body in
the world.
But
not even that fully expresses what happens in tonight’s Gospel story, so let’s
go back there for a moment. It seems we can always count on Peter to model the
hubris of humankind in a way that enables Jesus to teach us a profound lesson.
He
says to Jesus, in what is really a kind of pride cloaked in humility: Lord.., you will never wash my feet.
And
Jesus says to Peter: Unless I wash you,
you have no share with me.
Please…
and I know this has become a catch phrase on social media, but please… let that
sink in for a moment.
Outside
of love-drenched service, we have no share with Jesus.
I
began this evening by quoting Buchi Emecheta on the radically communal nature
of Nigerian culture. I want to go back to her now to say something about what
we as a Eucharistic, foot-washing community face in our struggle to make
community real in the world.
It
is this: Emecheta understands the nature of the enemy. Nigerian society, like
U.S. society, is divided into “haves” and “have-nots.” She herself is from the
class of have-nots, and her books are about the yawning and seemingly
insurmountable chasm between the haves and the have-nots. In her stories, poverty is the most divisive factor in society.
In short, Emecheta understands that poverty, in its many
interconnections with race, culture, politics, even religion, is a wall, tall
and thick, down the middle of the human community.
I
suspect that much of the time some of us, and some of the time all of us, have
a lot in common with the rich young man in that other Gospel story. We really
want to negotiate with God about what the new commandment—love God and your
neighbor as yourself—really means.
“Who’s
my neighbor?” we ask. What do you mean, “love”? But I suspect the Nigerians
have it about right: Everyone is responsible for everyone else. Our lives
belong to God’s community.
In the name of God, Father, Son and Holy
Spirit, AMEN.
No comments:
Post a Comment